Contact Us Home

October 13, 2003
MASSIVE CITY BUDGET DEFICIT

Tuesday’s meeting of Hamilton City Council promises to be painful. Two of the city departments are reporting a combined operating deficit this year of $19.4 million. In response they are presenting proposals for major fee increases and service cutbacks. These include an immediate HSR fare hike, fewer transit rides for the disabled, less litter and garbage pickup in cemeteries and downtown, and further deterioration in maintenance of city buildings.

It is illegal for a city’s operating budget to run a deficit. Hamilton has covered such deficits in the past with its Tax Stabilization reserve. At the beginning of 2001, there was $23 million in this reserve, but by the end of 2003 it will have been completely drained and will be itself actually showing a deficit. Staff has warned the Council that “any shortfall in 2003 will have to be taxed in 2004 in addition to the $45+ million in budget pressures already identified”. Covering all this would require a tax increase greater than 20%.

The Public Works department predicts a $16.2 million deficit this year. It is proposing to make the following cuts, most of them affecting the poor, the disabled, seniors and the deceased:

  • Imposing another immediate HSR fare hike of 15 cents per ride (on top of 10 cent hike in April)
  • increasing the seniors annual bus pass by $45
  • cancelling DARTS improvements made in February, thus cutting 19,500 rides for disabled users
  • eliminating the taxi scrip program for disabled persons, cutting another 45,000 rides a year
  • stopping all painting, window cleaning and carpet cleaning for the rest of the year
  • eliminating 50% of grass cutting and litter cleanup for the rest of the year
  • cutting computer training in the fleet services department
  • ending spring litter and debris removal from cemeteries, as well as leaf removal in fall
  • reducing cemetery grass cutting and garbage can emptying to once every two weeks
  • eliminating public support for Veterans Day functions, and reduce monument inspection and repair
  • reduce street sweeping from 16 times a year to four (after buying 2 extra sweepers last year)
  • doing maintenance on the Linc only when there’s a complaint
  • reducing downtown litter cleanup and street flushing by 25%
The Public Health and Community Services Department is reporting a $3.2 million deficit. This department is proposing:
  • elimination of 22 jobs at Wentworth Lodge
  • unpaid days off and a Christmas shut down program
  • not replacing departing staff for at least three months

The 2003 budget was only adopted six months ago. How has this massive deficit appeared so quickly? At least part of the explanation is that the budget predictions were extremely optimistic to allow the Council to avoid imposing a big tax hike that would have angered the voters in an election year. They gambled that the financial mess could be covered up until after November 10.

A second factor is the stampede of senior city staff leaving Hamilton for other jobs. Three dozen senior staff have quit so far this year including the heads of communications, legal, long range planning, heritage planning and the water and wastewater departments. This reflects the extremely low staff morale at the City, and the loss of key people creates further chaos in the bureaucracy.

The deficit also indicates that the budget cuts already imposed have likely been too extreme in many departments, and have been driven by a political wish for smaller tax increases rather than the actual requirements of operating the City.

The deficits in the operating budget are only a small part of the severe financial crisis facing the City.

In March, the Dominion Bond Rating Services imposed a “negative outlook” on Hamilton’s credit rating citing “a deterioration in the City's next tax-supported debt outlook resulting from an increase in the medium-term capital spending plan." The report specifically noted costs of the Red Hill Valley Expressway and the new waste management strategy as the key driving factors in increasing debt levels and warned that: "Any further increase to the tax-supported debt outlook would likely warrant further rating action".

The City is already paying over $50 million a year to service the existing debts. This uses up the first $400 from each homeowners’ taxes, and is more than the total spent on libraries, the HSR and DARTS combined. Current plans are to triple the external debt from $210 million at the beginning of 2003 to $643 million by 2007.

In June, staff warned that despite the borrowing, the City still faces a shortfall of nearly half a billion dollars in its ten year capital budget. And this budget does NOT include any money to renovate or re-build City Hall, or any of the $80 million for the Commonwealth Games, or any money for development near the airport or in existing City business parks. The Red Hill Creek Expressway is the only major "economic development" expenditure in the 10-year capital budget. The expressway project will use almost 13% of the total capital spending over the next 10 years, more than 10 times the amount allocated to downtown Hamilton, and more than four times the total allocated to parks.

The same June report said "The City’s state of roads, bridges, buildings, parks, arenas, water/sewer mains and fleet is rapidly aging as Hamilton faces an annual infrastructure gap estimated at $50 million per year". It also noted: "The City does not have any existing reserves for capital building replacements, like roads and facilities" and"Reserves declined by $110 million since 2000."

In mid-August, the auditors reported the City took in $1 billion last year, but spent $1.1 billion. Reserves went down $82 million, while unpaid taxes and other liabilities increased by $58 million, for a total drop of $140 million in taxpayers' equity. The auditors wrote: "The above items are indicators that the city does not have the appropriate oversight, discipline, rigour and planning in existence with respect to financial matters.” In response to the audit report, the City Treasurer declared: "Our financial position is deteriorating. There is no question about that part of it." The report was so critical that Councillor Murray Ferguson publicly admitted: "I don't think we're qualified to be an audit committee. Most of us don't understand financial statements."

In late August, the City Manager revealed that tens of millions of tax dollars are being spent without proper scrutiny by Council. "It surprises me the magnitude of the purchases that run through the system without council ... seeing them come forward or understanding what the purchase was for," he said. "What I find vexatious is that this is quite different than most other jurisdictions."

Citizens have an opportunity on November 10 to make some much needed improvements to Hamilton City Council.


© Friends of Red Hill Valley 1991-2005

Sign our Petition!