Contact Us Home

Opponents gear up to fight expressway on Escarpment
By KEN KILPATRICK
Special to the Globe and Mail
Tuesday, August 5, 2003 - Page A15

HAMILTON, Ont. -- Opponents of a proposed Niagara Escarpment expressway have been learning the tricks of the civil-disobedience trade from a Toronto activist in hopes of preventing the long-delayed project from starting today.

But the city of Hamilton has also been gearing up to quash the protest, sending a toughly worded letter of warning to leaders of the groups opposing the Red Hill Creek Expressway: Stay off the construction site or face the legal consequences, which could involve hefty fines, jail terms and civil actions.

The four-lane, eight-kilometre highway, which will shoot down the Niagara Escarpment and along a natural riverbed to join with the Queen Elizabeth Way, has been a political flash point since initial planning began in the late 1970s. In 1990, the New Democratic government cancelled funding for the project, even though two overpasses had already been built.

Two groups opposed to the road are planning what they say will be non-violent civil disobedience today, when construction begins on a $3.4-million overpass. News that one of the groups, ShowStoppers, has called in a Toronto activist for civil-disobedience training prompted city officials to issue their warning.

"As of 7 a.m., Tuesday, Aug. 5, it will be unlawful for members of the public to be within the area comprising the Greenhill Avenue construction project," says the letter, written by acting city solicitor Elaine Holt.

The city will seek damages from the people responsible for "incurring damages and costs arising from unlawful behaviour."

The eight-page document details a number of scenarios involving the law and citizens who disrupt construction. Under the heading Civil Action for Damages, the letter states that a civil court could order a person's home sold to pay the court judgment.

The letter also outlines other legal actions, including injunctions and criminal charges.

It also says it is prepared to make city-owned land available where protests can be carried out without interfering with construction, neighbours or traffic.

"It's a heavy-handed letter," said Linda Lukasic, an environmental activist and vice-chair of the Friends of the Red Hill Valley. "I've never received anything like this before."

Last week, her group met with Chris Murray, director of the Red Hill Valley Project for Hamilton, asking for construction to be delayed. She believes that residents in the surrounding area have not been given enough information or time to prepare for the project.

Ms. Lukasic said Mr. Murray and others at City Hall have taken a "rigid attitude" toward the construction start date. "He gave us a flat-out 'buzz off,' " she said.

But Mr. Murray noted that although "we value people's right to express disagreement, there are laws governing protests. We hope that everyone respects the law."

The east-west expressway will run from Dartnell Road on Hamilton's East Mountain to the QEW, and essentially be a continuation of the Lincoln Alexander Expressway, which runs east-west along the top of the escarpment.

Concerns about the hazards of living along the route have been voiced for years. At least 6,000 trucks are expected to use the route daily because it cuts approximately 12 kilometres off the current route over the Burlington Bay Skyway Bridge.

The city says the highway is needed for traffic control and to develop industrial and residential land on the East Mountain.

But Don McLean, chairman of the Friends of Red Hill Valley, said the people benefiting most will be private developers and trucking firms, while the average citizen will be left with dangerous exhaust emissions and the destruction of conservation lands.


© Friends of Red Hill Valley 1991-2005

Sign our Petition!