Contact Us Home

Monday, May 1, 2002
EXRESSWAY HITS NEW ROADBLOCK

Rick Hughes, Municipal Affairs Reporter
The Hamilton Spectator

Three suburban councillors say building the Red Hill Creek Expressway will bankrupt the city and are calling for a immediate referendum on the project. Councillors Margaret McCarthy (Ward 15), Dave Braden (Ward 15) and Russ Powers (Ward 13) yesterday issued a joint statement saying the city's dire budget picture makes it necessary for council to reconsider the costly highway.

"This singular project is taking us on the slippery slope toward bankruptcy," Powers said. "If it goes through, the only thing we will be able to maintain as a city is the most basic of public services. Financially we won't be able to move forward with new initiatives for a long, long time."

Expressway supporters, however, argue the roadway is an investment that over the long term will improve the city's economic status.

But the suburban councillors rely on figures provided in the city's budget documents to support their position.The budget report notes that the city still has to issue $79 million in debt for the road, which will add between $30 and $70 to the average tax bill for each of the next 10 years.

The proposed total tax increase this year (for an average assessment) is $115, or about 4.3 per cent.Over the time the expressway will be financed, the city's debt will double, which "is cause for concern for our credit rating agencies."

But beyond the numbers, the councillors — supported by staff — say that building the $200 million road will significantly curtail the city's ability to address a host of other needs. Foremost among them is overdue investments in roads and sewer infrastructure.

The budget document notes: "Unless substantial changes in funding variables occur, the city will not only fall further behind in infrastructure maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement, but also the approval of new capital projects will become financially prohibitive."

Braden argues the referendum is needed because the community has to make a fundamental choice, beginning with this budget. "This (the budget report) tells me in very direct terms that we can have either the Red Hill Creek Expressway or everything else. It's one thing or everything else."

The "everything else" includes things such as a quad pad arena and a badly needed overhaul of Wentworth Lodge, both of which are considered unaffordable.

McCarthy sees the choice the same way. "We won't have the ability to maintain the infrastructure costs, much less anything else if we go ahead with this roadway. It's sucking the city dry to fund the expressway."

The group offered no details on how a referendum might work.

The councillors' move is an attempt to reopen debate on the expressway project at a time when the city is closer than it has been to building it in more than a decade.

The referendum call does not represent a significant shift in support for the expressway at council. The three suburban councillors and Ward 2's Andrea Horwath are council's only consistent opponents of the project.

Expressway supporters were not impressed with the idea.

"I think the time for debate on this project has passed quite some time ago," said Ward 5 Councillor Chad Collins.

"The issue of the referendum calls into question the need for the project and the support that is out there. I think we've demonstrated that both are there."

Collins said the use of the budget figures amounted to a scare tactic.

Ward 8 Councillor Frank D'Amico called it political grandstanding.

Councillors yesterday moved into actual deliberations on their budget, deciding what services and programs can survive, which should be cut and which enhanced.

Councillors are faced with a grim budget picture and are struggling to reduce a proposed 5.5 per cent tax increase, while hoping to preserve core city services.

Ward 4 Councillor Sam Merulla and Ward 6 Councillor Tom Jackson both argued that rather than being a way into deeper financial troubles, the expressway is a way out of financial distress.

"To suggest that we cannot afford to build it is somewhat ludicrous," Merulla said.

"This community cannot afford not to build it, with respect to the future of the community," Jackson said.

"We need assessment growth as well, we need good transportation corridors, we need to get the heavy truck traffic off the local roads."

Ironically, it was pro-expressway people who were pushing for a referendum several years ago as a way of proving once and for all that the expressway had majority support.

City staff say they can begin to build through the valley sometime next year.

While opponents of the road argue for the preservation of the valley because of its value as a natural area, they have also been pushing the affordability issue for years.


© Friends of Red Hill Valley 1991-2005

Sign our Petition!