Contact Us Home

December 1999 Newsletter

City Charged Over Leaking Valley Landfill

On November 9th, 1999, with the help of the Environmental Bureau of Investigation and the Sierra Legal Defence Fund, charges were laid against the City of Hamilton for allowing the unabated flow of toxic leachate from the old Rennie Street landfill into Red Hill Creek.

The charges have been laid under Section 36(3) of the federal Fisheries Act and Section 14(1) of the provincial Environmental Protection Act. The federal Fisheries Act charge relates to the discharge of a deleterious substance into waters frequented by fish. The substance of concern in this instance is ammonia which, in its un-ionized form, is toxic to fish. Un-ionized ammonia was measured in the landfill leachate at levels 750 to 1000 times the provincial water quality objective.

The provincial Environmental Protection Act charge relates to the unlawful discharge of a contaminant, in this case PCBs, into Red Hill Creek. PCBs were measured in the leachate at levels 40,000 times above the provincial water quality objective.

Both the Fisheries Act and the Environmental Protection Act contain provisions allowing for citizens to initiate private prosecutions by collecting evidence and then bringing charges before a Justice of the Peace. This is what a small group from east Hamilton have done in their efforts to see the problems at the Rennie Street site rectified.

Background

The Rennie Street landfill, located just south of the Woodward Sewage treatment plant and Brampton landfill, is an interesting site with a long and rather colourful history. The site is still labelled on many maps as 'Patrick Burns Park', but is currently home to the City of Hamilton's Public Works Yard. Readily accessible to the public from the railway tracks that divert off of the Red Hill recreational trail at Brampton Street, or from the CN tracks off of Nash Road, the site is used as a dumping ground for street sweepings, some yard waste, construction debris and until recently snow removed from city streets.

But it is the historical use of the site that is the greatest cause for concern. The area was once a low-lying marshland, much like what you see at the mouth of the Red Hill Creek today. During the 1950s, landfilling began to take place here, and continued right up to the edge of Red Hill Creek.

Formal records of any materials deposited at the site in the early days are non-existent and any other information is sketchy, but longtime residents of the area are proving to be a very valuable information source.

Once the charges were formally laid, neighbourhood people began to come forward with astonishing, yet consistent, recollections of activities that took place at the Rennie site. Adults recounted playing near the dump as kids and watching trucks hauling industrial waste arriving at the site like clockwork. First thing each morning and then again at the end of the day, a truck would arrive with barrels of waste.

It was often liquid waste that was dumped from barrels directly onto the ground. Sometimes entire barrels were thrown into a gully located directly behind the homes on Waterloo Street, then crushed and buried with a backhoe.

Recent Developments

Since the charges were formally laid in early November, there has been a whirlwind of activity related to the Rennie Street site. On December 6, at a meeting of the city's Transport and Environment Committee, committee members approved the spending of $600,000 from a 'special reserve fund' to install a leachate collection system at Rennie. The same day as this decision, it was revealed that on November 29th, the local office of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment had issued a field order requiring the city to address the problems identified at the Rennie site. Included in the order are the following requirements, which must be satisfied by the end of December 1999: (1) install a silt fence to prevent the discharge of contaminated soil into Red Hill Creek. (2) cease all discharges of contaminated groundwater, leachate, and any other such liquids from the site into Red Hill Creek. (3) conduct a detailed site investigation and prepare a detailed remedial action work plan for the site.

The city has decided to appeal the field order, mainly to seek an extension on the timeline the Ministry of Environment has set out.

Meanwhile, the first court appearance related to the charges took place on December 7th. The city has hired Mr. David Crocker, an environmental lawyer, to represent them in this case. At this first meeting, an agreement was reached to hold over a pre-trial meeting to January 25th, 2000.

Expressway Connection

In our efforts to learn about the site, we examined a consultant's report issued in May 1998 as part of the expressway preparatory work. The report, prepared by Dillon Consulting, represents the results of a survey of potentially contaminated sites within the Red Hill Valley. The Rennie Street landfill is identified as the most problematic of all sites listed. Within this document there are maps which indicate that the proposed expressway would literally plow right through the old Rennie landfill. Detailed investigations of the portion of the site within the proposed roadway corridor indicated that the soil here is contaminated with high enough levels of PCBs to render it hazardous. The report also mentions the fact that the Region will cover the costs of any containment necessary at the site, as part of expressway construction.

It is difficult to imagine that a local government could be so blatantly negligent in its environmental responsibilities in this day and age. Why, given what the city knows about about the site, has there been no action to address the problem? A recent article on the Rennie landfill which appeared in the Hamilton Spectator has the communications spokesperson for the City of Hamilton explaining that the city will spend $600,000 for a leachate collection system which will later have to be partially torn out for expressway construction.

Combining the recognition that the Region plans to pay for any containment at the landfill with the fact that the city has failed to take any action to address problems at the Rennie site can only make one wonder whether we are once again witnessing the sacrifice of east Hamilton's environment for the expressway project. Was the plan to allow toxic leachate from Rennie to continue to flow freely into Red Hill Creek until such time as the city could rely on substantial financial contributions from the region to address the problems at the site? Sadly, when you step back and look at the history of the Rennie issue, it is difficult to draw any other logical conclusions.

If you have any memories of the Rennie Landfill that you are willing to share, please contact Lynda at 560-1177.


© Friends of Red Hill Valley 1991-2005

Sign our Petition!