Contact Us Home

October/November 2000 Newsletter

The Rennie Dump and the Expressway

In mid-September, the City of Hamilton pleaded guilty to allowing PCBs and other toxic wastes to pour into Red Hill Creek from the Rennie Street Landfill site. The City was fined $480,000 and has been forced to commit to an $11 million cleanup plan. The dump lies in the path of the proposed Red Hill Creek Expressway.

In early October, the region admitted the existence of a second dump in the path of the expressway. The cleanup costs for this site (including work on the Brampton dump) are estimated at $12 million, raising the total bill for dump remediation between the CNR and the QEW to at least $23 million.

These events have major implications for the proposed Red Hill Creek Expressway, and especially for the Region's desperate attempts to prevent a federal environmental assessment of the project. The revelations show that an assessment is absolutely critical. How many other dirty secrets related to the expressway has the Region been hiding?

While the City got charged because it owns the Rennie site, it is very clear that it is the Regional government which should bear most of the responsibility.

The Regional level of government is responsible for closed landfill sites. They weren't officially in charge of the Rennie site or the "Nash" dump because the sites were never registered as landfills. Old maps label the Rennie site "Patrick Burns Park", and the City has been using it for many years as a Public Works yard.

However, consultant reports for the expressway identify both sites as old landfills. For example, regional staff and politicians received an expressway planning study in 1989 called "Geotechnical Investigation Rennie Street Landfill North-South Parkway". It reported that discoloured liquid was leaking out of the dump into the creek, but apparently didn't examine it for PCBs or other toxics. In 1994, another set of expressway consultants noted the existence there of an "old municipal dump site" with an average depth of garbage of nine metres.

Like the Rennie dump, the "new" landfill is only a surprise to some. Regional officials have known about it since at least 1990 when Conestoga-Rovers & Associates presented a report to the Region that identified the site and reported that leachate from it was flowing into Red Hill Creek. The 1990 study was also done specifically for the expressway project.

Both dumps are also discussed in a July 1997 regional report done by a fourth set of expressway consultants. This "Red Hill Creek Watershed Study Report on Known and Potential Contaminant Sources" was prepared by Dillon Consulting Limited. Dillion subsequently did a two volume study that was given to the Region no later than May 1998 which said that PCBs were in the landfill and were leaking into the creek.

Some politicians have admitted knowing about Rennie but they had apparently decided not to bother stopping the toxic flows until they got around to building the expressway. Chad Collins, the chair of the City's Transport and Environment committee, told the Spectator in September: "We had a plan to clean it up that was part of the expressway project". Mr. Collins is one of the councillors who is supporting the Region's efforts to avoid an environmental assessment of the expressway. Fred Eisenberger, chair of the region's environmental services committee has also admitted he knew. His quote is: "I certainly didn't say I didn't know. Obviously the expressway has been a factor here." Eisenberger is also demanding the federal assessment be stopped.

In addition to the expressway studies, citizen groups have been complaining for years about the Rennie site. One was the Bay Area Restoration Council which wrote to the Region and the Ministry in 1995 asking for a full environmental assessment of the expressway project. Their report specifically mentioned Rennie and noted the existence of "several leachate flows from this area".

The 1996 Biological Inventory of Red Hill Creek prepared by the Hamilton Naturalists' Club for the Hamilton Region Conservation Authority, and provided to both the Region and the Ministry of the Environment noted: "below the CNR bridge, the Rennie Street landfill site on the west side has been backfilled into the creek, creating a high and very steep eroding bank. Several noxious leachate seepages, giving off petroleum odours, were found here draining into the creek."

In 1997, the City and the Region cooked up a deal transferring valley lands from the City to the Region for the expressway. Every piece of City land required for the expressway was sold except the dumpsites north of the CNR line. There was no explanation for this omission. The deal was finalized in the spring of 1998.

By that time, the Ministry of the Environment had carried out testing of the Rennie dump leachate and found the PCBs. In May 1998 they ordered the City "to carry out further testing to confirm these levels and to take the necessary remedial measures to eliminate the seepage of wastes into the creek." They also demanded a "comprehensive evaluation of the works yard site".

All of this evidence suggests that regional and city officials knew about the problems at Rennie for a long time, and chose to allow poisons to continue to flow into Red Hill Creek.

CONTAMINATION

The catalogue of contaminated sites north of the CNR line now stands at four — the Rennie Dump, the Brampton Dump, the Stoney Creek Dump and a 2.2 acre piece of property called Nash Auto Parts, which was purchased by the Region in 1998 for use for the expressway corridor. That latter item cost $2.95 million and staff estimated a further $1.35 million would be needed to cleanup the contamination from the wrecking yard operations.

PCBs

PCBs are one of the most dangerous chemicals known to humans and have been banned in Canada and the United States since the 1970s. PCBs are a carcinogen and bioaccumulate in the fat cells, reaching their highest concentrations in animals (such as humans) who are at the top of the food chain.

What goes into Red Hill Creek flows into Hamilton Harbour and within less than 90 days is part of Lake Ontario, the place we draw our water for cooking, bathing, drinking, etc. Our water treatment system is not equipped to remove PCBs and other chemicals.

Any councillor who still supports the Region's court challenge of the federal environmental assessment, should be required to explain why they think problems like the Rennie dump shouldn't be independently investigated. It is clear that the people in charge of the expressway project hid this toxic disaster from the public and that they cannot be trusted. Indeed, in many societies poisoning the water is considered a capital offence.


© Friends of Red Hill Valley 1991-2005

Sign our Petition!